It was inevitable, even though it was never discussed, that the federal government would be involved in a national debate on the need for a data governance system. 

In the coming months, it will have a chance to show its cards. 

The Federal Government is committed to making data more transparent and secure, and in doing so, it is seeking to help people understand how data is being used. 

As a result, data privacy has become a hot topic in the Australian public debate.

What we need to do to get this right and ensure data protection is upheld.

The Federal Opposition’s data privacy bill In January this year, the Federal Government introduced the Data Privacy Amendment (Data Security and Privacy Bill) Bill 2015.

This bill has a number of key elements that will be in place by 2019: A data security framework for all organisations, which includes a set of measures that are essential to ensuring data security. 

A Data Privacy Commissioner for all data held by Government entities. 

An independent body that would review the effectiveness of any new laws to protect privacy. 

Recommendations for legislation that address data protection issues, including the creation of a Data Privacy Review Commission to provide independent advice to government entities and other bodies, and for the Government to introduce an information technology privacy act.

A new National Data Privacy Policy and Principles, and an independent data protection commissioner for government entities.

And finally, the legislation is not without its critics.

As the Federal Opposition, the Government is not averse to engaging in discussion on the issue.

However, the federal opposition is unlikely to support the bill in its current form, and it is possible that this is because of concerns about privacy, particularly in relation to the provision of mobile phone and internet services.

The Federal opposition has made a number other statements on privacy in recent months.

In November, Labor MP David Seymour made an impassioned plea for the Federal Parliament to make data privacy law a law, rather than a policy.

It was a sentiment echoed by NSW MP Andrew Leigh, who tweeted that data privacy laws should not be legislated in an “artificial and artificial way” and that the Federal Privacy Act should be amended to allow for data privacy to be regulated.

Earlier in the year, a number opposition MPs also made statements, including in response to the introduction of the bill.

Liberal MP Ian Macdonald, for example, said that the bill “does not meet the test” of making data privacy a law and would “open the door for the police and spy agencies to access information from people’s private lives”. 

Labor MP David Leyonhjelm has also expressed reservations about the bill, saying: “This is not the way to do it.

It is a flawed and flawed bill.”

Liberal Senator David Leysen also expressed his concerns about the legislation.

“It would allow government agencies to gather all kinds of information from their citizens, but at the same time it would allow them to share it with their own agents, so they can use that information for their own purposes,” he said.

Independent MP Chris Bowen also expressed concerns about what he described as a “dangerous” section of the legislation, saying that it was “an attempt to allow the government to collect every single phone call made in Australia and turn it into an individualised information that could be used to prosecute and imprison someone.”

Liberal MP David Bischoff echoed those concerns, saying, “It’s a threat to freedom of speech.”

The Government’s position on privacy The Federal Government has repeatedly argued that data protection laws are necessary for the protection of people’s privacy.

During the Federal election campaign, the Coalition made a commitment to end the use of the data retention regime in the Federal Court, and a promise to abolish the Data Retention Act.

Under the current legislation, the Australian Privacy Principles apply to all data, including personal information.

While the current bill allows the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) and other agencies to collect data, these powers are limited in relation the use they are authorised to use. 

ASIO and other government agencies are also permitted to access data without the consent of the person to whom the data relates.

There is also a prohibition on access to any personal information without a court order.

Additionally, the Bill is designed to provide a “safe harbour” for individuals’ personal information, with a limited scope and requirements.

Data protection laws should be a matter for parliament, not government.

Further, privacy legislation should not interfere with the ability of governments to fulfil their statutory duties.

Australia has a robust and effective data protection regime.

We have a strong framework for ensuring privacy, including safeguards for personal information and for protecting against the collection of personal information for purposes such as intelligence gathering.

An independent data privacy commissioner and a national data protection regulator are critical to ensuring a fair and effective framework for the collection and use of

Tags: Categories: Quote